|

Volume III - The crossroads
of civilizations:
A.D. 250 to 750.
Editor
B.A. Litvinsky
Co-editors
Zhang Guang-da
and R. Shabani
Samghabadi

Tokharistan and Gandhara under Western Türk
rule (650 - 750)
Part One
History of the regions
(J. Harmatta)
Part Two
Languages, literature, coinage, architecture and art
(B. A. Litvinsky)
Ethnic groups and languages
The kingdom of the Kabul Shahis was multiracial,
inhabited by many different peoples. A considerable part of the
population was composed of sedentary speakers of: (i) Middle and
New East Iranian languages, Late Bactrian, and the New Iranian phase
- the Afghan language; and (ii) West Iranian languages in the Middle
Iranian and New Iranian phases Tajik or Persian. Sanskrit
and Prakrit were widespread. A large group of the population used
Indo-Iranian Dardic languages as their mother tongues. Of the aboriginal
languages of the east of the region, the linguistically isolated
Burushaski should be mentioned. Of particular importance are the
Türks (see Chapter 14), who
brought their language from the depths of Central Asia. Information
is given below about those ethnic groups and languages not discussed
in previous chapters.
The origins of the Tajiks and of their language
lie in remotest antiquity. According to the crament Iranologist
Lazard:
The language known as New Persian, which may
usually be called at this period by the name of dari or
parsi-i dari, can be classified linguistically as a continuation
of Middle Persian, the official, religions and literary
language of Sasanian Iran ...
New Persian belongs to the West Iranian group.
In its phonetic and even its grammatical structure, New Persian
had changed little from Middle Persian. Its vocabulary had changed,
however, because New Persian drew heavily on the East Iranian languages,
especially Sogdian, and also on the Turkic languages and Arabic.1
Middle Persian was widespread in Khurasan and some parts of Middle
Asia, partly promoted by the Manichaean movement. At the time of
the Arab conquest, New Persian had already appeared in Tokharistan.
According to Huei-ch'ao (writing in 726), the language of Khuttal
one of the most important domains of Tokharistan, located
in the south of modern Tajikistan was partly Tokharian, partly
Turkic and partly indigenous.2
In connection with the events of the first third
of the eighth century, the Arab historian al-Tabari relates that
the inhabitants of Balkh used to sing in the New Persian (Tajik)
language. It is quite possible, therefore, that a third ('indigenous',
according to Huei-ch'ao) language was current in Tokharistan in
addition to Tokharian and Turkic. If that is the case, Parsi-i Dari
would appear to have been in use in Tokharistan as early as the
sixth and seventh centuries. After the Arab conquest, the Dari language
also spread to other parts of Middle Asia and Afghanistan. Much
later it divided into separate Persian and Tajik branches, and a
third branch is sometimes identified too the Dari that is
the contemporary New Persian language of Afghanistan. Some 30 million
people speak these languages today. Like its close relatives Persian
and Dari, Tajik has a rich history documented by literary sources.
The wealth of literary and scientific writings created in the Middle
Ages in Parsi, the literary language that is common to both the
Tajiks and the Persians, is a cultural asset of the peoples of Iran,
Afghanistan and Tajikistan.3
The Tajiks emerged as a people in the ninth and
tenth (or perhaps the tenth and eleventh) centuries, but it was
not until the first third of the eleventh century that the term
'Tajik' began to be applied to them. That too was when Tajik (Persian)
literature was founded, and its first great representatives lived
and worked in Middle Asia.
Although the origins of the Afghans lie in very
ancient times,4 the first mentions
of the Afghan people appear only in the sixth and seventh centuries.
The Brhat-samhita (XVI, 38 and XI, 61) speaks of the pahlava
(Pahlavis), the svetahuna (White Huns or Hephthalites),
the avagana (Afghans) and other peoples. On his return journey
from India, the Chinese pilgrim Hsüan-tsang travelled from Varnu
(possibly modern Wana) to Jaguda in Ghazni, crossing the land of
A-p'o-k'ien,5 a word derived
from Avakan or Avagan, meaning Afghans. In Islamic
sources, the first reliable mention of the Afghans is found in the
Hudud al-calam, which says of a settlement on
the borders of India and the Ghazni district that there are
Afghans there too'. Mention is also made of a local ruler some of
whose wives were Afghan women.6
The Afghan language, or Pashto, is one of the East Iranian groups.
Among its characteristics, it contains a stratum of Indian words
and its phonetic system has been influenced by Indian phonetic systems,
which is not the case of other Iranian languages. There are approximately
23 million Pashto-speakers in Afghanistan and Pakistan today.7
The mountains in the east of modern Afghanistan
and the north of modern Pakistan were settled by Dards. They were
known to the ancient Greek authors, who used several distorted names
for them: Derbioi, Durbaioi, Daidala, Dadikai and Derdaios.8
In their descriptions of India, the Puranas speak of the
Darada in the same breath as the inhabitants of Kashmir and Gandhara.
They are repeatedly mentioned in the Ramayana and the Saddhar-masmrtyupasthana,
together with the Odra (the Uddiyana). In Tibetan sources, the
Darada are known as the Darta.9
There are two groups of languages that are now
generally known as Dardic. The first are the languages of Nuristan
(a region of Afghanistan): they form an 'individual branch of the
Indo-Iranian family belonging neither to the Indo-Aryan, nor to
the Iranian group'. The second group of languages (particularly
the Dardic) are 'part of the Indo-Aryan [group], though far departed
in their development from the latter'. The two groups, however,
have much in common in their 'structural and material features [phonetical,
grammatical and lexical]'.10
The Nuristani languages include Kati, Waigali, Ashkun and Prasun
(or Paruni) and are chiefly spoken in Nuristan. The Dardic languages
proper include Dameli, which is the link between the Nuristani languages
and the Central Dardic. According to one classification, the Central
Dardic languages comprise Pashai, Shumashti, Glangali, Kalarkalai,
Gawar, Tirahi, Kalasha and Khowar. The Eastern Dardic group is divided
into three sub-groups containing the Bashkarik, Torwali, Maiyan,
Shina, Phalura and Kashmiri languages. In the early 1980s Dardic
languages were spoken by 3.5 million people in Pakistan, India and
Afghanistan, of whom 2.8 million spoke Kashmiri, some 165,000 spoke
Khowar and some 120,000 spoke Pashai. The Nuristani languages were
spoken by around 120,000 people.11
Burushaski is a completely distinct language: it
stands at the confluence of three great families the Indo-European,
the Sino-Tibetan and the Altaic but belongs to none of them.
Its speakers live in northern Pakistan, in the region of the Hunza
and Vershikum rivers, and number around 40,000. The language's morphological
structure is very rich and the verb has a particularly extensive
system of accidence. Burushaski is one of the oldest tongues, but
its place in the system of ancient and modern languages remains
obscure. Although a literary tradition may well have existed in
the early Middle Ages, when Buddhism was widespread, no literary
records have been found, which hampers attempts to reconstruct the
language's past. There have been repeated attempts to trace its
affiliations, and links with the Caucasian, Dravidian, Munda, Basque
and other languages have been suggested, but from the standpoint
of contemporary linguistics the case is not conclusive. Burushaski
was unquestionably more current in ancient times and occupied a
number of regions where Dardic languages are now spoken and where
Burushaski acted as a substratal or adstratal foundation. Grierson
has even postulated that speakers of Burushaski or related languages
once inhabited all or almost all the lands now held by Dardic-speaking
tribes.12

1.
Lazard, 1971; 1975, pp.
5957.
2. Fuchs,
1938, p. 452.
3. Oransky,
1988, p. 298.
4. Morgenstierne,
1940; Grantovskiy,
1963.
5. Hui-li,
1959, p. 188.
6. Hudud
al-calam, 1930, p. 16-A.
7. Morgenstierne,
1942; Gryunberg,
1987.
8. Francfort,
1985, Vol. 1, pp. 3978.
9. Tucci,
1977, pp. 1112.
10. Edelman,
1983, pp. 1415, 356.
11. Morgenstierne,
1944; 1967; 1973; Fussman,
1972; Gryunberg,
1980; Edelman, 1983.
12. Grierson,
1919; Zarubin, 1927;
Lorimer, 1935,
Vol. 1; 1938 , Vol. 2; Klimov
and Edelman, 1970.
|