|

Volume IV - The age of achievement A.D. 750 to the end of the
fifteenth century
Part Two: The achievements
Editors
C.E. Bosworth
Chapter 16 Arts and crafts
Part One
Arts and crafts in Tansoxania and Khurasan
A. A. Hakimov
Part Two
Turkic and Mongol art
E. Novgorodova
Part Three Hindu and Buddhist
arts and crafts: tiles, ceramics and pottery
A. H. Dani

Part Three HINDU AND BUDDHIST
ARTS AND CRAFTS: TILES, CERAMICS AND POTTERY (A. H. Dani)
In this early medieval period of northern India,
there is evidence of continuity in the popular art of the local
people and of a marked change introduced by migrating peoples from
Central Asia further north, such as the Türks, Gujars and other
tribes who integrated themselves into the Rajput ruling system.
As Buddhism was now mostly confined to Afghanistan and north-western
India, Buddhist material may be recognized in the late phase of
Buddhist survival here, e.g. at Bhamala (5) and
Giri (6) in Taxila and from late terracotta and
stucco figures from Taxila and Bamiyan. These figures present new
ethnic elements which spread down through the Indus region and penetrated
into Rajasthan and the western part of the Gangetic plain and created
the Rajput style of art.
At Bhamala, the stupa court was paved, probably
at this late phase of the monastic survival, by terracotta tiles
with a coating of lime plaster. These tiles were laid flat and divided
into squares with lines of tiles-on-edge between them. Here the
arrangement of tiles assumes the form of the ‘Wheel of Law’, the
spokes and rims of which are formed of tile-on-edge. At another
place in front of a cell, the tiles bear a variety of patterns incised
on their faces, e.g. crosses, spirals, double-axes, swastikas, lotus
rosettes, concentric circles, quatrefoils of pipal leaves, etc.(7)
In the Indus region, the Türks (the Turushkas
of Sanskrit literature) created the Hindûshâhi style of terracotta
and ceramic art, one that was significant for terracotta human and
animal figurines. One example was found in the upper layers of the
Damkot excavation.(8) A handmade male figure shown
in a kneeling position with hands tied in front, it has pinched
facial features with a high arched nose and punctured eyes, and
a mouth depicted by a slit, and it wears roundels at the ears and
a turban on the head. It is thickly coated with red slip and painted
black on the eyebrows, arms, waist and feet.
In contrast to the above, we find a distinctive
variety of terracotta figurines from Bajaur which show typical Turkic
facial types and wear long, flowing garments for both men and women.
Two examples from the Islamabad Museum are female figurines holding
babies in their arms. One of them (Fig.
12) is seated on a pitcher stool with her legs prominently shown
in front. Her fat body bulges out on the seat, while she has a V-shaped
bejewelled neck ornament. She also has broad muscular cheeks with
her nose pinched and a slit mouth, and her eyes are applied and
incised. The back of her head is pressed. The other figurine (Fig.
13) is in a standing pose and wears a long, flowing robe to her
feet. Her nose is also pinched, but the eyes are just incised. She
has an ornamented cap on her head. Both the figures present a new
ethnic type. A third terracotta object shows an elephant (Fig.
14) with its trunk partly broken. On the body of the elephant
several lamps have been placed, suggesting that such lamp-loaded
elephants were probably used for ritual purposes.
Ceramic and pottery types are found in upper
layers of historical sites throughout this region, and have been
described by the excavators from sites such as Ahichchhatra, Charsada,
Tulamba and Damkot. At Mundigak in southern Afghanistan there is
an abrupt change, and we find here plain bowls and jars in red and
reddish brown.(9) A difference in decoration is
seen in the late pottery from the ruins of Ahichchhatra in Bareily
district, Uttar Pradesh, from strata II and I, dated respectively
to 750–850 and 850–1100. The most common type is a variety of ‘decorative
bowls’ which are made in mould and bear designs in relief on the
slipped red ground. The decorations are geometric patterns of oblique
or cross-hatchings or concentric semi-circles, lotus petals, various
shapes of rosettes, together with or alternating with conch-shells,
scrolls and arabesques. Other types include miniature jars, a double-spouted
jar and cooking vessels, sometimes with long handles. Pedestalled
bowls, probably used as incense-burners, have also been recovered.
These also bear decorations consisting of incised rectilinear or
curvilinear geometric patterns, spirals, zigzags and nick. Conch-shells
in relief are also seen.(10)
Sir Mortimer Wheeler has given a detailed classification
of the late pottery found in his excavation at Charsada (the Bala
Hisar mound) and he places them ‘as early as the eighth century
A.D.’(11) Such potsherds have often been discovered
in association with the glazed ware that was introduced by the Muslim
incomers to the north-western Indian plains. The chief characteristic
of the Hindu-style pottery shows a buff jar with friezes of stamped
notches and rosettes; a brown jar with horizontal linear and looped
patterns in white paint, and a buff rim with stamped parallel bars;
a reddish buff bowl with friezes of stamped circles, rosettes and
lines, and with a ram’s head spout; reddish-brown ware with stamped
rosettes, lozenges and triangles, slashed handles and slashed ears
or frills; and a reddish buff jar with oblique slashes round the
shoulder. All this pottery is of a buff or reddish buff colour.
Among the varieties, one may easily recognize a flat bowl with out-turned
lip; a carinated water jar with round base and narrow mouth; a trough-like
bowl with tapering sides; a flat-based cooking tray; round-bottomed
cooking pots; and many other kinds of bowls and water jars, handled
cups and drinking bowls. These varieties clearly reflect the social
life of the people who were using them. The most important items
missing are tall glasses meant for drinking and flat thalis,
generally used for eating food. In their place we have wide open
bowls with tapering sides meant for drinking; wide open bowls with
curved sides for eating; and cooking pots and water vessels for
bringing water from a distance. At Tulamba in Khanewal district
of the Multan Division in modern Pakistan, a complete sequence of
historical remains has been found for the periods III, IV and V,
spanning the eighth to the sixteenth century. The most outstanding
feature of these periods was the emergence of ‘Tulamba stamped ware’,
with a bewildering variety of over 200 designs, some showing parallels
with those from stratum I of Ahichchhatra. The pottery of period
III is of varied types, consisting of both thick and thin vessels.
The painted pottery, which occurred profusely in period III, has
designs painted either directly on the body of the vessels or over
red slip in black colour. The designs consist of groups of parallel
lines, triangles, loops, cross-hatching and zigzag lines. The pottery
stamped with designs on the shoulder of the vessel is different
from the pottery with impressed designs. The latter designs consist
of volutes, squares, diamonds, wheels, circles, eyes, ducks, human
faces and elliptical and wavy forms. These are usually decorated
with rays around the outer edge or small dots within or outside
a motif. On many specimens, the designs overlap and thus are only
partially visible because of irregular stamping. The ware is generally
made of well-levigated clay and is extremely hard. Among the varieties
of pots we have a large pan, a bowl with tapering sides or with
incurved sides, a small cup, a water pitcher, cooking vessels, a
flat-based dish, varieties of oil lamps and many kinds of storage
jars for food and water. Again there is an absence of flat thalis
and drinking glasses. The predominance of bowls, both for drinking
and eating purposes, shows the usage of the time. The cooking vessels
and the water pitchers follow the traditional types.(12)
Similar pottery has also been found from period
IV of Sarai Khola in Taxila.(13) The pottery assemblage
is mainly represented by an overwhelming majority of pieces in the
red ware tradition. It is mostly undecorated and plain, but some
of it is painted in black. However, we also find incised decoration
showing triangular designs and many lines. Among the varieties of
forms we have water pitchers, bowls, storage vessels, lids, incense-burners
and handled jars. These varieties show a close resemblance to the
late pottery from Charsada and Damkot in Dir district. Here again,
bowls of different types predominate.
The fortified site of Damkot near Chakdara has
yielded, in its stratum V, material of the Hindûshâhi period. The
hallmark of this ceramic industry also shows stamped designs, consisting
of rosettes, concentric circles and impressed parallel bars and
dots. Among the varieties of pots we find storage vessels; a water
pitcher; bowls of various kinds; a cooking vessel and a kneeding
trough with flat base and straight and curved sides; handled pots;
and others. We also get pedestalled bowls showing excellent surface
treatment and painted designs on the inside. The handled pots, in
which the handles are very often roughly striated, are found in
large numbers. Similarly spouted vessels with plain or decorated
spouts are found very frequently. The painted decoration of motifs
includes horizontal bands, loops, hatched or solid triangles, vertical
strokes and other floral patterns, usually executed in black, though
sometimes also in white. The most distinctive motif is the group
of triple leaves suspended from a stem.(14)
On the whole, we find new types only in terracotta
specimens that speak not only of new human elements but also of
a new style in dress and coiffure. But the ceramic and the pottery
types are decorated in a simple fashion, mainly by stamping and
incision. The characteristic types show varieties of bowls, cooking
vessels and water pitchers. Pedestalled bowls and cups and lamps
with pinched mouths were used for ritual purposes.

5.
Marshall, 1951, Vol. 1,
pp. 391–7. 6.
Ibid., pp. 342–7.
7. Marshall,
1951, Vol. 1, p. 394; Vol. 3, Pl. 119a–b. 8.
Rahman, 1968–69, Pl. 88, no.
173. 9. Casal,
1961, Figs. 124–5 and Pl. XXXVI, and pp. 163, 223–4.
10. Ghosh and Panigraphi,
1945, pp. 50–5. 11.
Wheeler, 1962, p. 80, Figs.
36–9. 12. For varieties of designs, see
Mughal, 1967, Figs. 30, 32 and
Pls. XV–XXIII. 13.
Halim, 1972, pp. 100–12.
14. Rahman,
1968–9, pp. 245–50; Mogil’nikov,
1981.
|